Showing posts with label mexico. Show all posts
Showing posts with label mexico. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 21, 2010

Immigration Needs An Answer, and Soon

The immigration issue needs to be addressed by Congress soon. While a federal judge may still derail the new Arizona law, it still leaves the bigger issue for someone to solve. Arizonans and others are sick of our sovereign nation being invaded by illegals. No matter that they may be coming to better their lives, get jobs, send money home, or other good reasons. There must be some organization to immigration, some comprehensive plan to deal with the continuing influx.

Ironically Mexican authorities would not allow it if non-Mexicans moved into their country illegally. Their solutions are even more harsh than the harshest proposal of anyone in the U.S. considered “anti-illegal.”

Mention anything close to amnesty, allowing those already here, to be “excused” and given the right to stay, and many will lapse into apoplexy. Yet is it reasonable to think that we can somehow roundup the estimated 12 million illegals in the country and put them on the bus back to Mexico? Do we really think they would stay put if there were no better deterrent than a broken down wall on the border?
While not everyone will agree with these solutions, we have to take some steps to get handle on this quickly. Here are my (hardly original) suggestions:

• Create a way to citizenship requiring registration with the government
• Have a criminal background check
• Pay a substantial fine for violating the laws of the U.S.
• Learn English before the citizenship test
• Get in the back of the line behind all the legal applicants for entrance to our great country.

Once they have registered and made the commitment to do the above in a defined amount of time, they could then obtain a “chartreuse card” allowing them to remain in the country and work. In fact, there must be a time limit on when they must find a way to support themselves and not be a burden of our social system. If they miss any of the requirements, they must agree to return to their home countries.

This, with a few more modifications, would be far better than the haphazard and sometimes cruel system we have now. We can still be a nation of immigrants, but it must be structured so that no one is harmed, especially those citizens who were born here. Anyone disagree?

Wednesday, August 6, 2008

The United States of North America?







A new book is coming out by Jerome Corsi titled The Late Great U.S.A.: The Coming Merger with Mexico and Canada. I haven't read the book or much of anything about it, but I'm sure it posits that with the current trade deals (and other agreements north and south) that the time is coming when the three North American countries will form some sort of union, maybe similar to the European Union, or maybe an entirely new country.

I posed in a prior blog, somewhat tongue in cheek, that we could begin to solve the illegal immigration problem by annexing Mexico. We had done so in the past (Texas, California, New Mexico, and Arizona) so it is not without precedent. From the title of Corsi's book, I suspect he doesn't see that merger as a good thing.
But hey (and Ola and eh?), it might just work to bring us Norte Americanos together. First, as I had said previously, U.S. businesses would race to open sites in Mexico to be closer to the now legal work force causing the need to move north for a job to evaporate. Second, the money we already send to Mexico would be used to help our own states (those created in Mexico) and not a foreign nation. Then, of course, we are already bi-lingual is so many ways (For Spanish, press 2).

And who wouldn't want to join Canada? Its people are nearly like us demographically, with their own accents that would then join our Midwestern twang, southern drawl, and New England's dropped Rs. Plus with so much room to expand if you just don't mind the cold.

And what an economic force we could be when all were united. The natural resources alone could be mined and drilled to make us energy independent, and the winds across the Yukon would excite T. Boone Pickens no end.

So I may read the book to see what the downside might be, but right now it sounds not half-bad as we used to say. I already planned to brush up on my Spanish, and I can say "oot and aboot" as well as any of them. Now, Quebec might be a problem.