Thirty-three, or 66%, of the states in the U.S. require some sort of ID at the polling place. Voters must present some form of official ID (government issued, usually) to be able to prove that they are legitimate electors. The strictness of the laws varies considerably but it is clear that two-thirds of the state legislatures felt it was enough of an issue to enact laws.
Proponents argue that it helps to prevent voter fraud of all kinds. Opponents, at least in some states, point to a lack of actual fraud reports. They go on to oppose voter ID by saying it would disenfranchise many people. They often name those groups such as the poor, minorities, and the elderly. They assume these groups are not smart enough to get the required ID card. Wisconsin’s strict law was put on hold after a circuit court judge ruled the law was unconstitutional, so that challenge will move through the judicial system, or the law will be modified to stand up to constitutional tests.
Voting for our representatives in government is an unchallenged right. The actual vote has become increasingly important in so many close cases that the system must get it right the first time with adequate proof of legitimate electors. To have voters show a Driver’s License, or a non-driver official state ID (provided at no cost to those who need it), does not seem like an unreasonable burden. Photo ID is required to fly, get a hotel room, obtain a passport, purchase pseudoephedrine, and myriad other things. No one seems to protest those ID requirements, yet voting is something sacred in a free society, and although it cannot be unduly restricted, as with a poll tax, asking you to prove who you are before you cast that vote protects the very essence of representative democracy.
