But it seems it is getting a little too easy for some to blame the government for all their ills; in fact, not just blame the government but expect the government to save them, bail them out, protect them from themselves.
Welfare used to be like that. Just have a kid or two and you got "free money". Oh to be sure, you'd never get rich in the pittance of that monthly check, but you didn't have to work for it. That, for the most part, has been taken care of and the country, it turns out, is better for it. As are those who would have kept drawing on the dole to live if it hadn't ended.
I found an old quote that summarizes some of this well from Isabel V. Sawhill, who was then a senior fellow at the Urban Institute in Washington, D.C. She maintained that there are certain social obligations that many in the underclass have not fulfilled. Here is what she said:
They have not studied hard, completed high school, delayed childbirth until after school, married, or held a steady job, refrained from drug or alcohol abuse.
Those who fulfill these social obligations of American life are unlikely to be be chronically poor. If they are poor despite having abided by the rules, society is much more likely to come to their rescue. The problem is too many people who are not fulfilling their end of the bargain; these people constitute the underclass.
Interesting points.
2 comments:
Well said Mr. Jansen. I have a co-worker whose ex-spouse is trying to file for their 3rd bankruptcy. This person is making the claim that they are unable to understand financial matters. This is a college educated professional, mind you.
What ever happened to honesty and integrity? It has become far too easy to walk away from your debt in our legal system. A person should not be ruined for life, but it shouldn’t be so easy that it becomes the normally suggested thing to do.
Well said Jerry! What's your take on the last debate and the election? I was disappointed to see you haven't made any recent opinions known!
Post a Comment