The story is, of course, a good one. Everyone wants to vicariously watch crooks and their antics, especially when they have the panache of John Dillinger. We all know the end too, but it is the journey that we want to see and the story was what I expected, knowing some of its history absorbed over a lifetime.
However, my objection to this film was director Michael Mann's use of the camera. It is de rigeur these days to use jerky camera motions for effect. We (the audience) once rejoiced at the invention of the Steadicam where a cameraman could chase the stars through alleys and over fences and make it look like a dolly shot. Now, Mann seems to intentionally revert to the herky-jerky of the old days.
Not only was most of the film shot with JerkiCam, even Norma Desmond would find the close-ups invasive. Mann shoots much of the film as if the camera is a microscope looking to find every pore on Johnny Depp's face (and he does). Closeups and jerkiness combined to make for a nice headache at the end of the 140 minute run. For me, the cinematography was distracting me from the storyline. I forget, did Dillinger still die in the end?
No comments:
Post a Comment